Message:22649 In: PACKET.WW

From: KQ6UP
Date: Tue, 19 May 26 18:26:00 Z
Newsgroups: PACKET.WW
Subject: Re^2: XZ Compression
Message-ID:
Path: N2MH4|N2MH|N2NOV|KQ6UP|W6TJ|KO6NMZ

R:260520/2124Z 31403@N2MH4.#SENC.NC.USA.NOAM LinBPQ6.0.24
R:260519/1831z @:N2MH.#NNJ.NJ.USA.NOAM [via AREDN Mesh] jnos 2.0p $:TFAR5CKO6NMZ
R:260519/1830z @:N2NOV.#RICH.NY.USA.NOAM $:TFAR5CKO6NMZ
R:260519/1829Z 7416@KQ6UP.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM BPQ6.0.24
R:260519/1827Z @:W6TJ.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM #:24296 [Grand Terrace, CA]
R:260519/1826z @:KO6NMZ.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM [Grand Terrace, C] DP6.00 $:TFAR5CKO6N

From: KQ6UP @ KO6NMZ.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM (Chris)
To: PACKET @ WW
Reply-To: KQ6UP @ KQ6UP.#SCA.CA.USA.NOAM

I found a comparison on Linux Journal:

https://bit.ly/3Ri7BgO

XZ wins for comprassion ratio.

-73 de Chris KQ6UP







Return To Bulletin List